Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TTD stock price vs FOXA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FOXA's multiple
Needs FOXA P/E.
Implied fair value · at TTD's multiple
Needs TTD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Trade Desk, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
FOX CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Meta Platforms, Inc.
TTD vs META
Alphabet Inc.
TTD vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
TTD vs AMZN
Snap Inc
TTD vs SNAP
Sinclair, Inc.
TTD vs SBGI
TEGNA INC
TTD vs TGNA
COMCAST CORP
TTD vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
TTD vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
TTD vs WBD
Paramount Global
TTD vs PARA
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TTD can sustain high-teens revenue growth and defend its 20.3% operating margin despite 3.3x net debt/EBITDA, then holding or accumulating on weakness may be reasonable because the current price is still within the historical band even though FOXA/DCF framing points to downside.
On a FOXA P/E basis, TTD’s 20.0x multiple is above FOXA’s 11.9x, yet the model implies a -40.8% downside to $10.67, indicating the valuation framework is punishing TTD relative to its current price. The gap is likely driven more by the applied earnings multiple and FOXA calibration than by a clean like-for-like comparison, since FOXA’s P/S and EV multiples are not directly comparable with TTD’s software-like profile.
Supporting Metrics
