Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TSLA stock price vs HOG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HOG's multiple
Needs HOG P/E.
Implied fair value · at TSLA's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Tesla, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$46.25
Base
$51.88
Bull
$61.86
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TSLA's current premium over HOG is unjustified given TSLA's materially lower margins and similar-to-lower ROIC, then reduce exposure or consider selling/shorting because a HOG-implied valuation would imply an approximate $9 fair price (~-97.5% downside) and multiples (P/E 416.4x, P/S 17.8x) are extreme relative to fundamentals.
TSLA trades at extreme valuation multiples versus HOG (P/E 416.4x vs 8.3x; P/S 17.8x vs 0.6x), producing a HOG-implied price near $9 and a -97.5% implied downside. The gap persists across EV-based metrics (EV/EBITDA 153.6x vs 2.6x, EV/Revenue 17.4x vs 0.6x), while TSLA's current share price sits well below its historical band but far above HOG-implied levels.
Supporting Metrics
