Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TMUS stock price vs QCOM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/E.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Needs TMUS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$58.94
Base
$82.78
Bull
$113.81
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Bear
$124.40
Base
$147.06
Bull
$176.56
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
TMUS vs T
COMCAST CORP
TMUS vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
TMUS vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
TMUS vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TMUS vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
TMUS vs CLFD
Broadcom Inc.
TMUS vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
TMUS vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
TMUS vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
TMUS vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
TMUS vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
TMUS vs QRVO
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TMUS can sustain its current margins and continue narrowing the valuation gap through faster growth or higher ROIC, then the stock can work from here, but based on the provided data QCOM still looks stronger on growth and capital efficiency, so the cleaner relative-value case is not clearly in TMUS’s favor.
TMUS is priced at 19.3x P/E versus QCOM at 50.1x, but the implied P/E-based price of $487.01 is far above TMUS’s current $187.53, creating a very large modeled upside that appears driven by the valuation framework rather than QCOM-relative fundamentals. On sales and cash-flow proxies, TMUS is cheaper than QCOM at 2.3x P/S versus 6.0x and 6.8x EV/EBITDA versus 18.1x, but QCOM is also operating at much richer multiples because its business profile differs materially.
Supporting Metrics
