T-Mobile Us, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$91.42B
- Cash
- −$5.60B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TMUS stock price vs PSA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PSA's multiple
Needs PSA P/E.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Needs TMUS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$58.94
Base
$82.78
Bull
$113.81
Public Storage · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
TMUS vs T
COMCAST CORP
TMUS vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
TMUS vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
TMUS vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TMUS vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
TMUS vs CLFD
National Storage Affiliates Trust
TMUS vs NSA
Prologis, Inc.
TMUS vs PLD
WEYERHAEUSER CO
TMUS vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
TMUS vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
TMUS vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
TMUS vs UDR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TMUS should trade closer to its DCF range and historical band rather than the PSA PSA-implied multiple, then the current price looks more like a modest undervaluation than a 99.9% upside opportunity because TMUS already has stronger growth, higher ROIC, and lower leverage than PSA, while PSA comparison is distorted by very different margin structures.
TMUS is valued at 18.2x P/E versus PSA at 36.4x, yet the implied price model suggests a near-doubling of TMUS from $177.19 to $354.28. The gap is driven by PSA’s much higher multiples on P/S and EV-based metrics, but those valuation anchors are less directly comparable across these two very different business models.
Supporting Metrics