Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TMUS stock price vs UDR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UDR's multiple
Needs UDR P/E.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Needs TMUS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$58.94
Base
$82.78
Bull
$113.81
UDR, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
TMUS vs T
COMCAST CORP
TMUS vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
TMUS vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
TMUS vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TMUS vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
TMUS vs CLFD
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
TMUS vs EQR
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
TMUS vs AVB
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
TMUS vs CPT
MID AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES INC.
TMUS vs MAA
APARTMENT INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO
TMUS vs AIV
WELLTOWER INC.
TMUS vs WELL
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TMUS can sustain its 8.5% revenue growth and 24.2% ROIC without a material deterioration in margins, then TMUS looks attractive to own because it is priced well below both UDR-implied and DCF valuation ranges while carrying much lower leverage than UDR.
TMUS trades at $175.89 versus an implied P/E value of $328.24, suggesting 86.6% upside on the provided multiple-based framework. The gap is reinforced by TMUS's lower valuation multiples than UDR on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, while TMUS also has materially lower leverage.
Supporting Metrics
