Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TMUS stock price vs NXPI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NXPI's multiple
Needs NXPI P/E.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, TMUS P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 12:21 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$58.94
Base
$82.78
Bull
$113.81
NXP Semiconductors N.V. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
TMUS vs T
COMCAST CORP
TMUS vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
TMUS vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
TMUS vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TMUS vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
TMUS vs CLFD
Qualcomm Incorporated
TMUS vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
TMUS vs AVGO
Texas Instruments Incorporated
TMUS vs TXN
NVIDIA Corporation
TMUS vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
TMUS vs INTC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TMUS can sustain 8.5% revenue growth while maintaining its 24.2% ROIC and low 0.5x net debt/EBITDA, then TMUS looks attractive versus NXPI because it is cheaper on every listed valuation multiple and the current price remains below the DCF range.
TMUS trades at a clear discount to NXPI on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, which is consistent with the lower implied price of $280.18 versus NXPI-implied range of $295.38 to $388.22. However, TMUS is already above its historical band midpoint and below NXPI-implied range, so the market is not pricing in the full relative-value gap.
Supporting Metrics
