Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: T stock price vs PANW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PANW's multiple
Needs PANW P/E.
Implied fair value · at T's multiple
Needs T P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AT&T INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$12.92
Base
$16.54
Bull
$22.98
Palo Alto Networks, Inc · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
T vs VZ
COMCAST CORP
T vs CMCSA
T-Mobile US, Inc.
T vs TMUS
Altice USA, Inc.
T vs ATUS
Clearfield, Inc.
T vs CLFD
EchoStar CORP
T vs SATS
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
T vs CRWD
Zscaler, Inc.
T vs ZS
Okta, Inc.
T vs OKTA
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
T vs CHKP
Rapid7, Inc.
T vs RPD
Cisco Systems, Inc.
T vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe T can sustain its current margins while improving growth and balance sheet quality, then a long position may be justified because T is priced near its historical low end and below DCF value; however, if you are using PANW as the valuation anchor, the comparison is not directly actionable because PANW’s much higher growth and ROIC support a fundamentally different multiple.
T trades at 7.6x P/E and 1.3x P/S versus PANW at 226.7x P/E and 32.1x P/S, which mechanically creates a huge implied-price gap. The gap is driven less by mispricing than by PANW’s much higher growth and T’s mature, low-growth profile.
Supporting Metrics
