Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: T stock price vs NXPI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NXPI's multiple
Needs NXPI P/E.
Implied fair value · at T's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, T P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AT&T INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$12.92
Base
$16.54
Bull
$22.98
NXP Semiconductors N.V. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
T vs VZ
COMCAST CORP
T vs CMCSA
T-Mobile US, Inc.
T vs TMUS
Altice USA, Inc.
T vs ATUS
Clearfield, Inc.
T vs CLFD
EchoStar CORP
T vs SATS
Qualcomm Incorporated
T vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
T vs AVGO
Texas Instruments Incorporated
T vs TXN
NVIDIA Corporation
T vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
T vs INTC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe T can sustain its 2.7% revenue growth while improving balance-sheet quality from the current 0.90 Altman Z-Score, then T looks attractive on a relative valuation basis because it trades far below NXPI on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA; otherwise, the low multiple may be justified by weaker business quality.
T trades at 8.2x P/E versus NXPI at 40.4x, with the comparison implying a large valuation gap despite T’s much lower current multiple. The implied price of $122.88 is far above T’s current price of $24.80, but that gap reflects a NXPI multiple that may not be appropriate given the different business models and capital structures.
Supporting Metrics
