Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: T stock price vs AME: inconclusive — current versus $114.99 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AME's multiple
Implied fair value · at T's multiple
Needs T P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 1:25 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 7.75x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 24.57x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AT&T INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$12.92
Base
$16.54
Bull
$22.98
AMETEK, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$96.00
Base
$117.55
Bull
$147.28
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
T vs VZ
COMCAST CORP
T vs CMCSA
T-Mobile US, Inc.
T vs TMUS
Altice USA, Inc.
T vs ATUS
Clearfield, Inc.
T vs CLFD
EchoStar CORP
T vs SATS
Parker-Hannifin Corp
T vs PH
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
T vs HON
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
T vs EMR
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
T vs CW
Avery Dennison Corp
T vs AVY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
T vs MTD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe T can improve its balance sheet profile and sustain modest growth without sacrificing margins, then T looks attractive relative to AME because its current multiples are far below AME levels and even below the DCF range; however, the case is mainly a valuation call rather than a quality call.
T trades at a steep discount to AME on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, with the headline AME-implied price of $114.81 implying 393.8% upside from the current $23.25 price. However, T also trades near the bottom of its own historical band, while the DCF range of $69.72 to $94.33 suggests substantial upside even before considering AME multiples.
Supporting Metrics
