Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SR stock price vs MGEE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MGEE's multiple
Needs MGEE P/E.
Implied fair value · at SR's multiple
Needs SR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Spire Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
MGE Energy, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
SR vs CNP
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
SR vs D
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
SR vs CHTR
NISOURCE INC.
SR vs NI
ATMOS ENERGY CORP
SR vs ATO
ALLIANT ENERGY CORP
SR vs LNT
WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC.
SR vs WEC
OGE ENERGY CORP.
SR vs OGE
Tesla, Inc.
SR vs TSLA
DTE ENERGY CO
SR vs DTE
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
SR vs PEG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SR can stabilize revenue growth while maintaining its current margin structure, then SR looks investable versus MGEE because it trades at lower P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples despite offering 17.8% implied upside.
SR trades at 18.4x P/E versus MGEE at 21.7x, and at 11.6x EV/EBITDA versus 16.9x for MGEE, indicating SR is valued at a discount on both earnings and enterprise-value bases. The current price of $80.46 also sits below the DCF range midpoint and below MGEE-implied range, but it is above the lower end of SR’s historical band.
Supporting Metrics
