Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SR stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at SR's multiple
Needs SR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Spire Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
SR vs CNP
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
SR vs D
NISOURCE INC.
SR vs NI
ATMOS ENERGY CORP
SR vs ATO
MGE ENERGY INC
SR vs MGEE
COMCAST CORP
SR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
SR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
SR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
SR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
SR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
SR vs CLFD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SR can reaccelerate growth and sustain its higher margins without requiring a rerating on leverage, then hold or accumulate only on weakness, because the current valuation already embeds a premium versus CHTR despite weaker growth and only middling quality signals.
SR trades at $79.56 versus a P/E-implied value of $18.32, indicating a -77.0% downside to CHTR-based valuation. The gap is especially notable because SR’s P/E of 18.2x is far above CHTR’s 4.2x, while SR also trades at richer P/S and EV/EBITDA multiples despite weaker growth.
Supporting Metrics
