Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: REG stock price vs FR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FR's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, FR P/E.
Implied fair value · at REG's multiple
Needs REG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
KIMCO REALTY CORP
REG vs KIM
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
REG vs BRX
AGREE REALTY CORP
REG vs ADC
CROWN CASTLE INC.
REG vs CCI
REALTY INCOME CORP
REG vs O
Prologis, Inc.
REG vs PLD
STAG Industrial, Inc.
REG vs STAG
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
REG vs REXR
Terreno Realty Corp
REG vs TRNO
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe REG can sustain its current growth and margin profile without paying a premium for underappreciated stability, then a modestly constructive stance is reasonable because REG is cheaper than FR on P/E and P/S while still showing positive ROIC and larger absolute earnings power.
REG trades at 27.0x P/E and 9.2x P/S versus FR at 32.9x P/E and 11.2x P/S, so REG is cheaper on earnings and revenue multiples. However, REG still sits below FR-implied price range midpoint but well above the DCF range, which limits the strength of the valuation case.
Supporting Metrics
