Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: REG stock price vs PLD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PLD's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, PLD P/E.
Implied fair value · at REG's multiple
Needs REG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Prologis, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
KIMCO REALTY CORP
REG vs KIM
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
REG vs BRX
AGREE REALTY CORP
REG vs ADC
CROWN CASTLE INC.
REG vs CCI
REALTY INCOME CORP
REG vs O
STAG Industrial, Inc.
REG vs STAG
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC
REG vs EGP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
REG vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
REG vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
REG vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
REG vs UDR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe REG can maintain its current growth and capital efficiency while avoiding leverage-driven pressure, then a modest overweight makes sense because REG is cheaper than PLD on every stated valuation metric and has a better ROIC, but the case is not strong enough for high conviction given the mixed quality signals.
REG trades at a meaningful valuation discount to PLD across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, which supports a relative value case. However, the implied upside to $113.54 sits above both the current price and REG's historical trading band, so the gap looks more aggressive than the historical range alone would justify.
Supporting Metrics
