Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: QCOM stock price vs CMCSA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CMCSA's multiple
Needs CMCSA P/E.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
COMCAST CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$32.69
Base
$42.75
Bull
$55.84
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Broadcom Inc.
QCOM vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
QCOM vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
QCOM vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
QCOM vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
QCOM vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
QCOM vs QRVO
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
QCOM vs CHTR
AT&T INC.
QCOM vs T
Walt Disney Co
QCOM vs DIS
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
QCOM vs BRK-B
NETFLIX INC
QCOM vs NFLX
T-Mobile US, Inc.
QCOM vs TMUS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe QCOM can sustain its 13.7% revenue growth, 55.4% gross margin, and 45.4% ROIC, then hold or accumulate on weakness because the business quality is strong even though CMCSA-based valuation screen looks stretched.
On the provided P/E comparison, QCOM’s implied price of $22.94 versus its current $149.11 suggests an 84.6% downside relative to CMCSA, which is driven by QCOM’s much richer 29.8x P/E versus CMCSA’s 4.6x. However, QCOM also trades within its own historical band and above the top of the DCF range, so the gap looks valuation-driven rather than purely fundamental.
Supporting Metrics
