Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: QCOM stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Broadcom Inc.
QCOM vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
QCOM vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
QCOM vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
QCOM vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
QCOM vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
QCOM vs QRVO
COMCAST CORP
QCOM vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
QCOM vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
QCOM vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
QCOM vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
QCOM vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
QCOM vs CLFD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe QCOM’s growth, margin strength, and capital efficiency deserve a premium multiple over CHTR, then QCOM looks attractive on relative quality, because its revenue growth is 13.7% versus -0.6%, ROIC is 45.4% versus 11.6%, and leverage is far lower.
The comparison shows a wide valuation divergence: QCOM trades at 33.5x P/E versus CHTR at 4.2x, yet QCOM also has materially stronger growth and returns. The provided P/E-based implied price of $21.11 suggests an -87.4% downside from QCOM’s current $167.86, which is far below both CHTR-implied range and QCOM’s own historical band.
Supporting Metrics
