Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: POOL stock price vs CPRT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CPRT's multiple
Needs CPRT P/E.
Implied fair value · at POOL's multiple
Needs POOL P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
POOL CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
COPART, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HOME DEPOT, INC.
POOL vs HD
GENUINE PARTS CO
POOL vs GPC
LOWES COMPANIES INC
POOL vs LOW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
POOL vs HAYW
Leslie's, Inc.
POOL vs LESL
CARVANA CO.
POOL vs CVNA
CARMAX INC
POOL vs KMX
OPENLANE, Inc.
POOL vs KAR
AUTONATION, INC.
POOL vs AN
Tesla, Inc.
POOL vs TSLA
FORD MOTOR CO
POOL vs F
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe POOL can reaccelerate revenue growth and preserve its ROIC while narrowing the margin gap versus CPRT, then POOL looks reasonable to own because it trades at a lower P/E and much lower P/S than CPRT; otherwise, the current setup favors a hold rather than an aggressive buy.
POOL trades at $185.71 versus an implied P/E-based price of $198.71, suggesting about 7.0% upside on this frame. However, CPRT comparison is mixed because POOL is cheaper than CPRT on earnings and sales multiples, but its operating profile is materially weaker.
Supporting Metrics
