Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: POOL stock price vs HAYW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HAYW's multiple
Needs HAYW P/E.
Implied fair value · at POOL's multiple
Needs POOL P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
POOL CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Hayward Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HOME DEPOT, INC.
POOL vs HD
GENUINE PARTS CO
POOL vs GPC
LOWES COMPANIES INC
POOL vs LOW
Leslie's, Inc.
POOL vs LESL
SMITH A O CORP
POOL vs AOS
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC
POOL vs LII
Johnson Controls International plc
POOL vs JCI
AAON, INC.
POOL vs AAON
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
POOL vs IR
Trane Technologies plc
POOL vs TT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe POOL can re-accelerate growth or sustain its superior ROIC without needing HAYW-like margins, then accumulating POOL makes sense because it already trades cheaper on P/E and P/S while carrying a reasonable balance-sheet profile.
On a P/E basis, POOL trades at 17.1x versus HAYW at 22.3x, and the model implies 30.0% upside to $241.41 from the current $185.71 price. The market is also valuing POOL cheaper on sales, with P/S at 1.3x versus 2.9x for HAYW, but the EV/EBITDA gap is much smaller at 12.4x versus 12.9x.
Supporting Metrics
