Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PLD stock price vs IP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at IP's multiple
Needs IP P/E.
Implied fair value · at PLD's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, PLD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Prologis, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
STAG Industrial, Inc.
PLD vs STAG
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC
PLD vs EGP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
PLD vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
PLD vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
PLD vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
PLD vs UDR
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA
PLD vs PKG
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO
PLD vs SON
GREIF, INC
PLD vs GEF
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO
PLD vs GPK
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PLD should be valued on its superior margins and stable profitability rather than a revenue-multiple IP anchor to IP, then avoid relying on IP-implied $8.65 estimate and instead weight the historical band and DCF range more heavily because PLD’s operating metrics are much stronger than IP’s.
The valuation gap is extreme: PLD’s current price of $144.61 implies downside of 94.0% to IP-derived $8.65 estimate, driven primarily by PLD’s much richer sales multiple than IP. On a relative basis, PLD trades at 15.3x P/S versus IP at 0.9x P/S and 16.3x EV/Revenue versus 1.1x, so IP model mechanically compresses PLD’s valuation despite its superior profitability.
Supporting Metrics
