Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PLD stock price vs EQIX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EQIX's multiple
Needs EQIX P/E.
Implied fair value · at PLD's multiple
Needs PLD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Prologis, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
EQUINIX, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
STAG Industrial, Inc.
PLD vs STAG
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC
PLD vs EGP
WEYERHAEUSER CO
PLD vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
PLD vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
PLD vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
PLD vs UDR
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
PLD vs DLR
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
PLD vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
PLD vs CCI
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
PLD vs IRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PLD’s superior margins, faster growth, and lower leverage deserve a valuation closer to its EQIX multiple, then the current price can be justified; if you place more weight on the DCF range and the middling F-Score, then the stock looks less compelling at $147.12.
PLD trades at 41.3x P/E versus EQIX at 75.2x, which makes PLD look cheaper on earnings, but its P/S multiple is actually higher at 15.6x versus 11.1x. The stock also sits above the high end of the historical band when using EQIX-implied range, but well above the DCF range, suggesting valuation depends heavily on the multiple framework used.
Supporting Metrics
