Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PK stock price vs CLDT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CLDT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CLDT P/E.
Implied fair value · at PK's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, PK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Chatham Lodging Trust · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
PK · not enough data.
CLDT · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PK can materially improve margins and delever from its very high 24.2x net debt/EBITDA, then the stock may be worth holding or adding because CLDT-implied P/S valuation shows upside; otherwise, the weak profitability and balance sheet argue for caution.
PK trades at $15.12 versus an implied price of $26.75 from the provided P/S model, implying 76.9% upside, but that valuation signal conflicts with weak earnings quality and leverage. The current price is also near the upper end of the historical band ($13.61-$16.63), while the DCF range of $0.88-$1.19 suggests a much lower intrinsic value estimate.
Supporting Metrics
