Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PK stock price vs HLT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HLT's multiple
Needs HLT P/S.
Implied fair value · at PK's multiple
Needs PK P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
-$9.41
Base
-$8.20
Bull
-$6.25
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC /MD/
PK vs MAR
RLJ Lodging Trust
PK vs RLJ
HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
PK vs HST
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
PK vs APLE
Hyatt Hotels Corp
PK vs H
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
PK vs CHH
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP
PK vs LVS
MGM Resorts International
PK vs MGM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PK can materially improve margins and reduce leverage toward HLT-like levels, then a long position could work because the stock is far below HLT-implied P/S valuation; otherwise, the data argue for caution because PK’s current economics and balance sheet do not support closing the gap.
PK trades at $15.06 versus a HLT-implied $75.59, implying 401.9% upside on the P/S framework. However, PK’s 1.2x P/S is being compared with HLT’s 6.0x alongside much weaker margins and returns, so the gap reflects both lower scale and lower quality.
Supporting Metrics
