Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NEE stock price vs EXC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EXC's multiple
Needs EXC P/E.
Implied fair value · at NEE's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, NEE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NEXTERA ENERGY INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
EXELON CORPORATION · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Duke Energy CORP
NEE vs DUK
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
NEE vs D
SPIRE INC
NEE vs SR
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
NEE vs PEG
DTE ENERGY CO
NEE vs DTE
PG&E Corp
NEE vs PCG
SOUTHERN CO
NEE vs SO
ENTERGY CORP /DE/
NEE vs ETR
CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC
NEE vs ED
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC
NEE vs AEP
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NEE can sustain its faster revenue growth and superior operating margins without further multiple compression, then holding or modestly accumulating makes sense because the stock is fair on P/E but justified by stronger fundamentals; if you expect valuation to converge toward DCF or EXC-like multiples, then avoid adding because NEE already trades at a large premium on EV/EBITDA and P/S.
On the stated P/E basis, NEE is essentially at fair value versus EXC, with current price of $86.92 almost identical to implied price of $86.90. The deeper valuation picture is more nuanced: NEE trades at far richer sales and EBITDA multiples than EXC, which appears justified by stronger growth and margins but still leaves limited obvious upside from relative valuation alone.
Supporting Metrics
