Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NEE stock price vs SR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SR's multiple
Needs SR P/E.
Implied fair value · at NEE's multiple
Needs NEE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NEXTERA ENERGY INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Spire Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Duke Energy CORP
NEE vs DUK
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
NEE vs D
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
NEE vs PEG
DTE ENERGY CO
NEE vs DTE
PG&E Corp
NEE vs PCG
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
NEE vs CNP
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
NEE vs CHTR
NISOURCE INC.
NEE vs NI
ATMOS ENERGY CORP
NEE vs ATO
MGE ENERGY INC
NEE vs MGEE
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NEE's premium to SR is justified by sustainable superior operating margins and continued revenue growth, then maintain or modestly add exposure; otherwise, trim or avoid NEE because current price implies a premium while leverage (NetDebt/EBITDA 9.4x) and weak quality scores (Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 1.21) increase downside risk to SR-implied price ($69.93).
NEE's implied P/E-based price ($69.93) implies a -23.4% downside from the current $91.31, signaling a valuation premium to SR. The premium is evident across multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) even though NEE sits inside its historical trading band.
Supporting Metrics
