Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MTN stock price vs PARA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PARA's multiple
Needs PARA P/E.
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, MTN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VAIL RESORTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Paramount Skydance Corp · implied price per share
Bear
-$12.23
Base
-$11.43
Bull
-$10.17
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
MTN vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
MTN vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
MTN vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
MTN vs LYV
COMCAST CORP
MTN vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
MTN vs DIS
NETFLIX INC
MTN vs NFLX
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
MTN vs WBD
Fox Corp
MTN vs FOXA
NEWS CORP
MTN vs NWSA
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MTN can sustain its 18.9% operating margin and 2.7% revenue growth despite leverage of 8.9x Debt/Equity, then MTN looks attractive versus PARA because MTN is profitable, efficient, and priced below its DCF range while PARA remains deeply loss-making.
Direct relative valuation is limited because PARA has no usable P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, or EV/Revenue data in the provided set, while MTN trades at 19.8x P/E and 1.8x P/S. MTN’s $149.38 share price sits above the midpoint of its historical band but still well below the DCF range, suggesting the market is valuing it conservatively versus intrinsic estimates.
Supporting Metrics
