Vail Resorts, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$231.35M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MTN stock price vs NFLX: inconclusive — current versus $1.45K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NFLX's multiple
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Needs MTN P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VAIL RESORTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Netflix, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
MTN vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
MTN vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
MTN vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
MTN vs LYV
Apple Inc.
MTN vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
MTN vs AMZN
COMCAST CORP
MTN vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
MTN vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
MTN vs WBD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MTN can sustain its current margins while improving growth and reducing leverage, then consider MTN because it trades well below the NFLX-based NFLX-implied value and below the DCF range; otherwise, the NFLX comparison likely overstates upside given MTN's slower growth and weaker balance sheet.
On the provided NFLX-implied valuation, MTN's current price of $149.38 sits far below the implied $2,652.82, suggesting a very large discount to the NFLX multiple set. However, that gap is not directly actionable because NFLX trades on much faster growth and much higher ROIC, while MTN has slower growth and materially more leverage.
Supporting Metrics