Monster Beverage Corp
—- Market cap
- $42.21B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$2.09B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 ·
Decision snapshot: MNST stock price vs FLO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FLO's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Implied fair value · at MNST's multiple
Needs MNST P/E.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Monster Beverage Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
FLOWERS FOODS INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COCA COLA CO
MNST vs KO
PEPSICO INC
MNST vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
MNST vs KDP
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
MNST vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
MNST vs TAP
BROWN FORMAN CORP
MNST vs BF-A
Gentherm Inc
MNST vs THRM
Post Holdings, Inc.
MNST vs POST
J M SMUCKER Co
MNST vs SJM
Zoetis Inc.
MNST vs ZTS
CONAGRA BRANDS INC.
MNST vs CAG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MNST can sustain its high growth and premium margins long enough to justify 39.8x earnings, then hold or accumulate only on meaningful weakness; otherwise, the -53.6% implied downside and current price above both DCF and FLO-implied ranges argue for caution.
MNST trades at 39.8x P/E and 10.7x P/S versus FLO at 18.5x P/E and 0.3x P/S, so the market is paying a large premium for MNST’s superior growth and profitability. However, the provided implied price of $42.12 versus the current price of $90.73 indicates a -53.6% gap, suggesting the stock is rich even after accounting for quality differences.
Supporting Metrics