Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MNST stock price vs PEP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PEP's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, PEP P/E.
Implied fair value · at MNST's multiple
Needs MNST P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Monster Beverage Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PepsiCo, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$33.73
Base
$44.81
Bull
$59.24
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COCA COLA CO
MNST vs KO
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
MNST vs KDP
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
MNST vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
MNST vs TAP
BROWN FORMAN CORP
MNST vs BF-A
STARBUCKS CORP
MNST vs SBUX
Mondelez International, Inc.
MNST vs MDLZ
Kraft Heinz Co
MNST vs KHC
TYSON FOODS, INC.
MNST vs TSN
KELLANOVA
MNST vs K
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MNST can sustain its 10.7% revenue growth and 41.3% ROIC while defending its 29.2% operating margin, then holding or accumulating may be justified despite the valuation premium; otherwise, the current price looks hard to support versus the $53.03 implied price and the much lower PEP/DCF ranges.
MNST trades at a much richer valuation than PEP on every listed multiple, which is consistent with its stronger growth and returns profile but still leaves a large gap to modeled value. The implied price of $53.03 is 45.0% below the current price of $96.38, while the historical band suggests the shares are near the upper end of their recent range.
Supporting Metrics
