Martin Marietta Materials Inc
—- Market cap
- $30.18B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$67.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MLM stock price vs SHW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SHW's multiple
Needs SHW P/E.
Implied fair value · at MLM's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY · implied price per share
Bear
$57.59
Base
$75.34
Bull
$98.46
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Vulcan Materials CO
MLM vs VMC
EAGLE MATERIALS INC
MLM vs EXP
CEMEX SAB DE CV
MLM vs CX
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
MLM vs GVA
Summit Materials, Inc.
MLM vs SUM
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC
MLM vs MHK
HOME DEPOT, INC.
MLM vs HD
LOWES COMPANIES INC
MLM vs LOW
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
MLM vs PPG
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC/DE/
MLM vs RPM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MLM can reaccelerate revenue growth and sustain its superior operating margins while closing the ROIC gap versus SHW, then the relative P/E discount supports owning MLM because the implied price is 23.3% above the current level.
MLM trades at 29.2x P/E versus SHW at 36.0x, which underpins the model’s implied upside to $676.40 from the current $548.57. On this basis, MLM looks cheaper on earnings, but not on sales, and its current price is already above the midpoint of SHW-implied range.
Supporting Metrics