Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MLM stock price vs SUM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SUM's multiple
Needs SUM P/E.
Implied fair value · at MLM's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, MLM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Summit Materials, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MLM can stabilize revenue declines and sustain its superior margins and ROIC, then accumulate or hold the stock because it trades at the midpoint of its historical range and commands premium multiples justified by stronger profitability and lower leverage; if you believe revenue weakness persists or the low Piotroski score signals deterioration, then defer new buys or trim positions because downside to the historical lower band (~$586.76) remains possible.
MLM sits at a current price of $651.96, exactly at the midpoint of its historical band ($586.76 - $717.16), implying the market is neither discounting nor highly rewarding the name relative to its recent historical range. The stock shows explicit valuation multiples (P/E 20.1x, P/S 6.1x, EV/EBITDA 15.1x) that reflect a premium justified by stronger profitability versus SUM but comparison is incomplete because many SUM multiples are N/A.
Supporting Metrics
