Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KIM stock price vs PSA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PSA's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, PSA P/E.
Implied fair value · at KIM's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KIM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
KIMCO REALTY CORP · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Public Storage · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
KIM · not enough data.
PSA · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
REALTY INCOME CORP
KIM vs O
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
KIM vs REG
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
KIM vs BRX
AGREE REALTY CORP
KIM vs ADC
National Storage Affiliates Trust
KIM vs NSA
Prologis, Inc.
KIM vs PLD
WEYERHAEUSER CO
KIM vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
KIM vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
KIM vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
KIM vs UDR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KIM can sustain faster growth and maintain its current operating margin without its higher net debt/EBITDA becoming a constraint, then KIM looks reasonable to hold or accumulate because it trades at a clear P/E and P/S discount to PSA; if you prioritize stronger profitability and lower leverage, PSA remains the higher-quality comp.
KIM trades at 24.0x P/E versus PSA at 36.3x, and 7.7x P/S versus 11.9x for PSA, indicating a clear valuation discount. However, the implied price of $37.02 sits above KIM’s current price of $24.43 while also spanning a wide PSA-implied range, so the apparent upside depends heavily on whether KIM can justify a higher multiple.
Supporting Metrics
