Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KIM stock price vs CSGP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSGP's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CSGP P/E.
Implied fair value · at KIM's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KIM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
KIMCO REALTY CORP · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
COSTAR GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
KIM · not enough data.
CSGP · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
REALTY INCOME CORP
KIM vs O
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
KIM vs REG
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
KIM vs BRX
AGREE REALTY CORP
KIM vs ADC
WELLTOWER INC.
KIM vs WELL
Prologis, Inc.
KIM vs PLD
Public Storage
KIM vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
KIM vs EQR
CROWN CASTLE INC.
KIM vs CCI
CENTERSPACE
KIM vs CSR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CSGP’s earnings base will normalize enough to make its valuation multiples more meaningful, then stay neutral or avoid chasing the implied upside because KIM already looks fairly priced versus its own historical band and has materially stronger current profitability.
On a P/E basis, KIM screens dramatically cheaper than CSGP-implied valuation because CSGP’s P/E is 1510.5x versus KIM’s 24.4x, which mechanically produces an unrealistic implied price of $1540.71. However, CSGP range is very wide and includes $12.03 to $1316.73, while KIM’s own historical band is much tighter at $22.38 to $27.36, placing the current price of $24.87 near the middle of its historical range.
Supporting Metrics
