Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
K stock price vs KO: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | K | KO | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) K: FY 2023 -> FY 2024 | KO: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | -2.8% | 1.9% | KO leads by 252.0% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 33.6% | 61.6% | KO leads by 45.5% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 15.5% | 39.0% | KO leads by 60.2% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.6 | 1.7 | KO leads by 53.2% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | K | Delta vs KO | KO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.75B | 73.4% lower | $47.94B |
| Gross profit | $4.28B | 85.5% lower | $29.54B |
| Operating income | $1.87B | 86.4% lower | $13.76B |
| EBITDA | $1.98B | 89.4% lower | $18.69B |
| Net income | $1.34B | 89.8% lower | $13.11B |
| EPS | 3.9 | 27.6% higher | 3.0 |
| Revenue growth | -2.8% | 252.0% lower | 1.9% |
| Gross margin | 33.6% | 45.5% lower | 61.6% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | 48.8% lower | 28.7% |
| EBITDA margin | 15.5% | 60.2% lower | 39.0% |
| Net margin | 10.5% | 61.5% lower | 27.3% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
K looks fundamentally weaker than KO on margins and growth, but the valuation framework implies a wide upside versus DCF and KO-implied ranges, leaving the stock at an unclear relative-value pivot.
If you believe K can sustain KO-like valuation multiples despite weaker margins and negative revenue growth, then K may be attractive on KO-implied framework because the implied price is $111.79 versus a DCF range of $31.72-$42.91; otherwise, the safer view is that K deserves a discount until profitability and growth improve.
The valuation picture is mixed: KO-implied price is $96.56-$287.98 and the stated implied price from the P/E framework is $111.79, while the DCF range is much lower at $31.72-$42.91. That spread suggests the market could justify a materially higher value if K is re-rated closer to KO on earnings multiples, but the DCF range argues the current earnings power may not support that level.
Supporting Metrics