Nordstrom, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.04B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: JWN stock price vs LCID: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LCID's multiple
Needs LCID P/E.
Implied fair value · at JWN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, JWN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Nordstrom, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Lucid Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
JWN vs TJX
ROSS STORES, INC.
JWN vs ROST
Macy's, Inc.
JWN vs M
KOHLS Corp
JWN vs KSS
Walmart Inc.
JWN vs WMT
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
JWN vs COST
Tesla, Inc.
JWN vs TSLA
Rivian Automotive, Inc. / DE
JWN vs RIVN
FORD MOTOR CO
JWN vs F
General Motors Co
JWN vs GM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LCID’s high revenue growth can eventually overcome its severe margin and loss structure, avoid using LCID-implied P/S anchor for JWN; based on the data provided, JWN looks fundamentally stronger and should not be justified by a valuation framework built on LCID’s weak profitability.
The provided LCID-implied price of $158.21 is based on LCID’s P/S framework, but JWN has no listed P/S multiple in the input, making the valuation bridge incomplete. The DCF range of $36.10 to $48.84 suggests a much lower intrinsic value band than LCID-implied figure, highlighting a wide gap between the two methods.
Supporting Metrics