Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HUBS stock price vs NVDA: inconclusive — current versus $32.73 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NVDA's multiple
Implied fair value · at HUBS's multiple
Needs HUBS P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 100% equity / 0% debt · EV / Revenue 20.80x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 33.72x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
HubSpot, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NVIDIA CORP · implied price per share
Bear
$43.09
Base
$52.57
Bull
$59.95
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Salesforce, Inc.
HUBS vs CRM
ADOBE INC.
HUBS vs ADBE
INTUIT INC.
HUBS vs INTU
Atlassian Corp
HUBS vs TEAM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
HUBS vs AMD
INTEL CORP
HUBS vs INTC
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
HUBS vs TXN
Broadcom Inc.
HUBS vs AVGO
QUALCOMM INC/DE
HUBS vs QCOM
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC
HUBS vs MCHP
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HUBS can materially improve operating leverage from its 19.2% revenue growth and convert its 83.8% gross margin into meaningful operating profit, then hold or add selectively; otherwise, the current 298.9x P/E looks hard to justify versus NVDA's far stronger growth and profitability profile.
The P/E-based implied price of $32.73 versus the current $257.08 suggests an 87.3% downside, signaling a very large valuation gap. That gap is driven by HUBS's much higher P/E of 298.9x versus NVDA's 38.1x, even though HUBS also trades at much lower P/S and EV/revenue multiples than NVDA, reflecting its smaller scale and lower earnings power.
Supporting Metrics
