Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HUBS stock price vs AVGO: inconclusive — current versus $41.80 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Implied fair value · at HUBS's multiple
Needs HUBS P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
HubSpot, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Salesforce, Inc.
HUBS vs CRM
ADOBE INC.
HUBS vs ADBE
INTUIT INC.
HUBS vs INTU
Atlassian Corp
HUBS vs TEAM
NVIDIA Corporation
HUBS vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
HUBS vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
HUBS vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
HUBS vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
HUBS vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HUBS can rapidly convert its 83.8% gross margin and 19.2% revenue growth into materially higher operating margins and ROIC, then you can justify holding or averaging in; otherwise, the data favor reducing exposure because the current price embeds a valuation premium that is far above both AVGO comparison and the DCF range.
HUBS trades at a much richer multiple than AVGO-adjusted valuation suggests, with an implied price of $41.80 versus a current price of $237.36, or -82.4% downside. The gap is driven by HUBS's elevated P/E of 276.0x versus AVGO's 48.6x, even though HUBS is far smaller and less profitable.
Supporting Metrics
Edwyn research
