Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HOG stock price vs AAP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AAP's multiple
Needs AAP P/E.
Implied fair value · at HOG's multiple
Needs HOG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Harley-Davidson, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$46.25
Base
$51.88
Bull
$61.86
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BORGWARNER INC
HOG vs BWA
LKQ CORP
HOG vs LKQ
FORD MOTOR CO
HOG vs F
Tesla, Inc.
HOG vs TSLA
COPART INC
HOG vs CPRT
PACCAR INC
HOG vs PCAR
AUTOZONE INC
HOG vs AZO
GENUINE PARTS CO
HOG vs GPC
MONRO, INC.
HOG vs MNRO
NORDSTROM INC
HOG vs JWN
ROSS STORES, INC.
HOG vs ROST
TARGET CORP
HOG vs TGT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HOG can stabilize revenue declines and maintain its current margin profile, then HOG looks attractive relative to AAP because it is materially cheaper on earnings and enterprise-value multiples while showing stronger profitability and leverage metrics.
HOG trades far below the implied P/E valuation of $226.89, and its current price of $26.19 sits near the low end of the provided historical band. Relative to AAP, HOG looks cheaper on earnings and far more attractive on cash-generation proxies, even though AAP comparison is distorted by AAP’s very high P/E.
Supporting Metrics
