Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HLT stock price vs LVS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LVS's multiple
Needs LVS P/E.
Implied fair value · at HLT's multiple
Needs HLT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC /MD/
HLT vs MAR
Hyatt Hotels Corp
HLT vs H
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
HLT vs CHH
HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
HLT vs HST
MGM Resorts International
HLT vs MGM
WYNN RESORTS LTD
HLT vs WYNN
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
HLT vs CZR
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
HLT vs PENN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HLT can sustain a persistent premium multiple despite slower growth than LVS, then hold or add cautiously; otherwise, rotate toward LVS or avoid HLT because HLT trades at 52.3x P/E and 23.4x EV/EBITDA versus LVS at 19.5x and 10.1x with a model-implied downside of 62.8%.
HLT trades at a steep premium to LVS on both earnings and sales multiples, which is difficult to justify given LVS’s faster revenue growth. The provided implied price of $119.09 versus the current $319.91 indicates a 62.8% downside, and HLT also sits well above both LVS-implied range and the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
