Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HD stock price vs SUM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SUM's multiple
Needs SUM P/E.
Implied fair value · at HD's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, HD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Home Depot, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$86.60
Base
$109.07
Bull
$140.31
Summit Materials, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LOWES COMPANIES INC
HD vs LOW
FASTENAL CO
HD vs FAST
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
HD vs GWW
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
HD vs SWK
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
HD vs WHR
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO /DE/
HD vs TSCO
Vulcan Materials CO
HD vs VMC
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
HD vs MLM
Arcosa, Inc.
HD vs ACA
CRH PUBLIC LTD CO
HD vs CRH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HD’s premium multiple is justified by its superior ROIC and margin durability, then maintain exposure to HD because its 33.3% ROIC and 12.7% operating margin materially outperform SUM’s 7.3% ROIC and 11.9% operating margin; if you instead prioritize DCF-based downside protection, the valuation argues for caution.
HD’s current price of $331.96 sits within its historical band of $298.76-$365.16, but it is well above the DCF range of $126.55-$171.22. The valuation picture is incomplete because SUM has no comparable P/E, P/S, or EV multiples provided, so the relative gap is driven more by HD’s own absolute valuation than a direct multiple-to-multiple comparison.
Supporting Metrics
