Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HD stock price vs GPC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GPC's multiple
Needs GPC P/E.
Implied fair value · at HD's multiple
Needs HD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Home Depot, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$86.60
Base
$109.07
Bull
$140.31
GENUINE PARTS CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LOWES COMPANIES INC
HD vs LOW
FASTENAL CO
HD vs FAST
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
HD vs GWW
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
HD vs SWK
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
HD vs WHR
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO /DE/
HD vs TSCO
BORGWARNER INC
HD vs BWA
FORD MOTOR CO
HD vs F
Tesla, Inc.
HD vs TSLA
LKQ CORP
HD vs LKQ
COPART INC
HD vs CPRT
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
HD vs HOG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HD can sustain its superior margins and ROIC while GPC’s earnings multiple normalizes, then favor HD because the fundamentals are stronger even though GPC-based implied price is mechanically inflated by GPC’s extreme valuation.
The implied price of $2,971.65 versus HD’s current price of $310.78 suggests a very large upside, but that result is driven by the relative P/E setup rather than a broad cross-check of valuation. On other measures, the picture is less extreme because HD trades at 1.9x P/S and 15.3x EV/EBITDA versus GPC at 0.6x P/S and 39.8x EV/EBITDA, which points to GPC being cheaper on sales but far more expensive on earnings and cash generation.
Supporting Metrics
