The Home Depot, Inc.
$357.71B- Market cap
- $307.79B
- Debt
- +$51.31B
- Cash
- −$1.39B
Capital structure 86% equity / 14% debt · EV / Revenue 2.17x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 14.66x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 · Mkt capMarket cap $307.79B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 10:40 AM ET
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: HD stock price vs CTVA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CTVA's multiple
Needs CTVA P/E.
Implied fair value · at HD's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 86% equity / 14% debt · EV / Revenue 2.17x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 14.66x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Home Depot, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$103.62
Base
$131.79
Bull
$172.10
Corteva, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LOWES COMPANIES INC
HD vs LOW
FASTENAL CO
HD vs FAST
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
HD vs GWW
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
HD vs SWK
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
HD vs WHR
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO /DE/
HD vs TSCO
MOSAIC CO
HD vs MOS
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
HD vs CF
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co
HD vs ADM
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC
HD vs IFF
Bunge Global SA
HD vs BG
Ingredion Inc
HD vs INGR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HD can sustain its current margins and capital returns without material leverage pressure, then HD looks attractive relative to CTVA because it is cheaper on P/E, P/S, and EV-based multiples while delivering stronger ROIC and net margin.
HD trades at 22.3x P/E versus CTVA at 48.9x, so HD is materially cheaper on earnings despite the model implying a much higher price for HD. On sales and EBITDA multiples, HD also screens below CTVA, while the current price sits above the DCF range and within/above the historical band, suggesting the P/E-based upside is not broadly supported by the other valuation methods.
Supporting Metrics