The Home Depot, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$51.31B
- Cash
- −$1.39B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HD stock price vs BBCP: inconclusive — current versus $1.65K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BBCP's multiple
Implied fair value · at HD's multiple
Needs HD P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Home Depot, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$86.60
Base
$109.07
Bull
$140.31
CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LOWES COMPANIES INC
HD vs LOW
FASTENAL CO
HD vs FAST
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
HD vs GWW
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
HD vs SWK
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
HD vs WHR
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO /DE/
HD vs TSCO
CEMEX SAB DE CV
HD vs CX
Arcosa, Inc.
HD vs ACA
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
HD vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
HD vs PRIM
MASTEC INC
HD vs MTZ
TUTOR PERINI CORP
HD vs TPC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HD’s superior growth, ROIC, and earnings quality deserve a premium over BBCP’s weak growth and low net margin, then holding HD is reasonable, but the supplied valuation outputs should be treated cautiously because BBCP-based upside looks inconsistent with HD trading near its historical band and above the DCF range.
On the provided P/E basis, HD’s implied price of $1,538.42 versus a current price of $331.96 implies a 363.4% upside, which is unusually large for a mature large-cap retailer. However, BBCP comparison is not clean because BBCP has a much smaller base and a very high P/E of 108.1x, so the relative valuation gap is likely distorted by earnings scale and quality differences.
Supporting Metrics