Global Payments Inc.
—- Market cap
- $23.36B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$8.34B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: GPN stock price vs ZS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ZS's multiple
Needs ZS P/E.
Implied fair value · at GPN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Zscaler Inc · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VISA INC.
GPN vs V
Mastercard Inc
GPN vs MA
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
GPN vs PYPL
Block, Inc.
GPN vs XYZ
FISERV INC
GPN vs FI
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
GPN vs JKHY
Palo Alto Networks Inc
GPN vs PANW
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
GPN vs CRWD
Okta, Inc.
GPN vs OKTA
Cloudflare, Inc.
GPN vs NET
Fortinet, Inc.
GPN vs FTNT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GPN can stabilize growth and maintain its current profitability, then the current price looks more defensible than ZS on a relative basis because GPN already trades at far lower earnings and revenue multiples; if not, the weak growth and quality scores argue against paying a higher multiple for it.
On a P/S basis, GPN trades at 3.1x versus ZS at 9.3x, so GPN is far cheaper than ZS on headline revenue multiples. However, the large implied price gap is mainly a function of ZS’s higher growth profile rather than GPN’s superior fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics