Global Payments Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$8.34B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GPN stock price vs AVGO: inconclusive — current versus $280.93 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Implied fair value · at GPN's multiple
Needs GPN P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
VISA INC.
GPN vs V
Mastercard Inc
GPN vs MA
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
GPN vs PYPL
Block, Inc.
GPN vs XYZ
FISERV INC
GPN vs FI
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
GPN vs JKHY
NVIDIA Corporation
GPN vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
GPN vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
GPN vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
GPN vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
GPN vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GPN can reverse its negative revenue growth and materially improve ROIC and leverage, then consider the name; otherwise, the low multiple is better viewed as justified rather than a clear bargain because AVGO’s superior margins, growth, and quality metrics explain the valuation gap.
GPN trades at 13.6x P/E versus AVGO at 48.6x, which on the surface implies substantial upside, but the comparison is distorted by very different operating profiles. GPN also sits below AVGO-implied valuation range and only modestly above its historical band, suggesting the current price already reflects its weaker fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics