Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GLW stock price vs META: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, META P/E.
Implied fair value · at GLW's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, GLW P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CORNING INC /NY · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
GLW · not enough data.
META · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TE Connectivity plc
GLW vs TEL
AMPHENOL CORP /DE/
GLW vs APH
CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
GLW vs COMM
HUBBELL INC
GLW vs HUBB
BELDEN INC.
GLW vs BDC
Apple Inc.
GLW vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
GLW vs AMZN
NVIDIA CORP
GLW vs NVDA
Alphabet Inc.
GLW vs GOOGL
MICROSOFT CORP
GLW vs MSFT
Snap Inc
GLW vs SNAP
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GLW can sustain premium multiples despite materially lower margins and ROIC than META, then hold or own selectively; otherwise, the data supports reducing exposure because GLW's price is far above META-implied and DCF values while profitability is clearly weaker.
GLW's current price of $165.68 sits far above both META-implied value range and the DCF range, implying a large downside versus META-based valuation benchmarks. The gap is driven mainly by GLW's much higher P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples relative to META, even though GLW's business quality is weaker across margins and ROIC.
Supporting Metrics
