Corning Inc /Ny
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.53B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GLW stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $49.30 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at GLW's multiple
Needs GLW P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CORNING INC /NY · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TE Connectivity plc
GLW vs TEL
AMPHENOL CORP /DE/
GLW vs APH
CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
GLW vs COMM
HUBBELL INC
GLW vs HUBB
BELDEN INC.
GLW vs BDC
Apple Inc.
GLW vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
GLW vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
GLW vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
GLW vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
GLW vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
GLW vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GLW can sustain its 19.1% revenue growth while sharply expanding margins toward MSFT-like levels, then the stock could deserve a premium; otherwise, the current price looks difficult to justify because GLW trades at 107.6x earnings and 49.5x EV/EBITDA versus MSFT’s much lower multiples.
GLW is trading at a much higher earnings multiple than MSFT, with P/E of 107.6x versus 35.5x, despite materially lower profitability. The model’s implied price of $64.88 suggests 67.0% downside from the current price of $196.82, and GLW also sits above the top of MSFT-implied range.
Supporting Metrics