Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FTV stock price vs WDAY: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WDAY's multiple
Needs WDAY P/E.
Implied fair value · at FTV's multiple
Needs FTV P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Fortive Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WORKDAY, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
FTV vs EMR
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
FTV vs HON
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC
FTV vs ROK
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
FTV vs KEYS
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
FTV vs TDY
AMETEK INC/
FTV vs AME
Salesforce, Inc.
FTV vs CRM
Oracle Corporation
FTV vs ORCL
INTUIT INC.
FTV vs INTU
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
FTV vs ADP
Paycom Software, Inc.
FTV vs PAYC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FTV can stabilize growth and sustain its higher margins while reducing leverage, then the stock looks worth owning because its P/E is far below the implied price and below WDAY's 61.9x; if growth remains weak and net debt/EBITDA stays elevated, the rerating case is much less compelling.
FTV's current price of $59.21 is far below the P/E-based implied price of $107.10, suggesting substantial upside under that framework. However, the multiple comparison is not one-sided: FTV trades at a lower P/E than WDAY but a higher P/S and similar EV/EBITDA, so the valuation gap depends heavily on which metric is weighted most.
Supporting Metrics
