Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FTV stock price vs AME: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AME's multiple
Needs AME P/E.
Implied fair value · at FTV's multiple
Needs FTV P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Fortive Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AMETEK, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$78.63
Base
$93.91
Bull
$113.81
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
FTV vs EMR
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
FTV vs HON
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC
FTV vs ROK
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
FTV vs KEYS
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
FTV vs TDY
Parker-Hannifin Corp
FTV vs PH
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
FTV vs CW
Avery Dennison Corp
FTV vs AVY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
FTV vs MTD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe Fortive can materially narrow its operating margin and ROIC gap with AME while sustaining or accelerating revenue growth, then buy to FTV AME-implied $89.14 because the current price $54.59 implies a 63.3% upside driven by a re-rating from P/E 23.1x toward AME multiple (37.8x); otherwise, hold or wait for operational evidence of improvement given weaker margins, lower growth and higher net leverage.
Fortive currently trades at $54.59 versus a AME-implied price of $89.14 (63.3% implied upside). The valuation gap is driven by lower market multiples for Fortive (P/E 23.1x) relative to AMETEK (P/E 37.8x) and materially lower revenue and enterprise multiples for AME on a per-dollar basis (P/S and EV/Revenue show meaningful dispersion). Fortive's current price sits squarely in its historical band ($49.13 - $60.05), effectively at the band midpoint.
Supporting Metrics
