Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FI stock price vs XYZ: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at XYZ's multiple
Needs XYZ P/E.
Implied fair value · at FI's multiple
Needs FI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
FISERV, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$41.10
Base
$57.43
Bull
$78.70
Block, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FI vs FIS
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
FI vs GPN
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
FI vs JKHY
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
FI vs PYPL
Block, Inc.
FI vs SQ
Mastercard Incorporated
FI vs MA
INTUIT INC.
FI vs INTU
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
FI vs FOUR
WEX Inc.
FI vs WEX
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FI can sustain its superior margins and moderate growth while keeping leverage under control, then FI remains attractive on a relative quality basis because its profitability and ROIC are well ahead of XYZ; however, the valuation case is only tentative because FI’s market multiples are not provided and the DCF range sits below the implied price.
The comparison suggests FI is not obviously cheap or expensive because the key market multiples for FI are unavailable, while XYZ trades at 32.9x P/E, 1.7x P/S, and 17.0x EV/EBITDA. FI’s implied price of $208.59 sits above the DCF range of $111.89 to $151.38, which points to the valuation assumption being more aggressive than the cash-flow framework.
Supporting Metrics
