Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EXPD stock price vs CAR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CAR's multiple
Needs CAR P/E.
Implied fair value · at EXPD's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, EXPD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
EXPD vs CHRW
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
EXPD vs JBHT
FEDEX CORP
EXPD vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
EXPD vs UPS
Uber Technologies, Inc
EXPD vs UBER
FORD MOTOR CO
EXPD vs F
General Motors Co
EXPD vs GM
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
EXPD vs WAB
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
EXPD vs ODFL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EXPD’s historical trading band and strong profitability are the right anchors rather than the low P/S-implied valuation, then hold or accumulate EXPD because its 4.4% revenue growth, 7.3% net margin, and 42.0% ROIC are far superior to CAR’s negative earnings and 5.6x net debt/EBITDA.
On the provided P/S framework, EXPD’s current price of $170.59 versus an implied price of $34.91 suggests a -79.5% downside, but that result is inconsistent with EXPD’s own historical band of $153.53 to $187.65. CAR screens much cheaper on revenue multiples, yet its weaker profitability and much higher leverage make that discount unsurprising.
Supporting Metrics
