Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: EAT stock price vs CMP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CMP's multiple
Needs CMP P/E.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EPS (TTM) is negative, EAT P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: EAT FY 2026 (ended Jun 24, 2026) · CMP FY 2025 (ended Sep 30, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Seven fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$108.89
Base
$128.11
Bull
$147.33
Compass Minerals International, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
-$14.64
Base
-$17.22
Bull
-$19.80
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.01x
3.62x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.39x
11.39x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$110.00M
$59.70M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$448.00M
$847.70M
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
EAT vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
EAT vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
EAT vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
EAT vs PLAY
MOSAIC CO
EAT vs MOS
Intrepid Potash, Inc.
EAT vs IPI
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
EAT vs MLM
Vulcan Materials CO
EAT vs VMC
HECLA MINING CO/DE/
EAT vs HL
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EAT can sustain its 21.9% revenue growth, 64.0% ROIC, and 7.1% net margin, then the right move is to hold rather than chase here because the supplied valuation model still implies -37.3% downside from $191.83.
EAT's current price of $191.83 sits above the DCF range midpoint and within the historical band, but the supplied implied price is only $120.28, indicating 37.3% downside from the current level. On a relative basis, the valuation picture is mixed because EAT's P/S of 1.5x is only modestly above CMP's 1.0x, while its much stronger operating profile makes the gap look less like a clear bargain and more like a quality premium.
Supporting Metrics
